Social Privacy: Does It Exist?

Privacy (or the lack thereof) is the hottest topic on the web right now thanks to Facebook. Many are outraged and upset, therefore an enormous amount of content has been created for us to read, watch and listen to the rants and criticism of those posting their opinions. I find it really fascinating. I originally went with the status quo on this one. After the “like button” made it out to thousands, and counting, sites on the web everything has seemed to change. But after some realization, I really don’t think it has. I actually think it’s gotten more realistic.

The Like Button has Everyone confused. We are now alarmed and concerned. Where, When and How will the content we choose to share be seen or heard, and by Whom? Even if all our settings are pointed to private, we are told someone could see something to do with us somehow or someway at some point in time. But, is that truly a bad thing? Or is it realistic to think that’s out of line?

The Social Web has grown. In the beginning it was new and fun. A lot of discovery was happening on how this new communication tool was something we could actually create relationships with, reconnect with old friends, conduct ourselves almost as in real life by sharing any text, audio or visual we wanted. Now we come to a point where it’s big, matured quite a bit, grown to about 500 Million people on Facebook alone. We’ve established ourselves on one or more of these sites whether it’s Facebook, Twitter or anywhere else. We communicate with people as we do in real life. It’s no longer something we try to figure out. It’s something we just use, like the telephone.

We also can choose who we want to communicate with Directly.

But, Not Indirectly… Huge Difference.

That’s when it hit me like a ton of Direct Messages. I really had to take a step back and realize I was really missing this major point. The point that Social and Private only co-exist on a direct one to one basis. Indirect Communication is never private in real life and cannot be censored unless severe measures are taken, which last time I checked aren’t happening in the community I live in.

For example, If I am having a 2-way private conversation in person with a friend, it’s private for that moment in time. But, that person has the ability to do and say anything they choose to. Therefore, it’s only private while it’s happening. After that, anything could be shared that I’ve said. I’d like to trust my friend, if I had told them something I would rather not have shared beyond that exchange, but it’s impossible to censor or control what happens from there. I think where I went wrong blaming Facebook for privacy issues is that I did not fully think about social interaction, whether it’s online or in real life. The same rules apply.

Especially if you think about the fact we are putting our own selves out there. The more visible we all are, the more people will overhear or oversee. Such as life. Some want that visibility more than others. We can only control so much of what we share, or in other words, what is relayed onto others. If we want complete and total privacy, the only solution I can see is never communicate with anyone. We all know that’s impossible. We must work, we have hobbies, we want to see our family. Everyone we come in contact with has a voice and can communicate in some way shape or form. It’s no different, to me at least, whether it’s communicating at a coffee shop with a friend sitting across the table or behind a computer screen to everyone in your network on Facebook. We are sharing with people. People are sharing with others. Sometimes our interactions go onto people we will never even know about.

Anyway, these are my thoughts on Social Privacy. I believe the two do not co-exist. I would love to hear your thoughts on what you think is happening right now on the web in regards to Privacy. Whether you agree or have a different take,  I’d just love to hear your perspective so that I can continue to learn and grow.

I really appreciate the time you took to read the post and very much so looking forward to any thoughts and feedback you might have on the topic.
Respectfully,
DG

Comments

comments

Related posts:

  1. The Social Measuring Cup: Evaluating Metrics It’s a pretty well known fact that I’m not a...
  2. Friend or Follow: Why Not Both? I’ve been thinking quite a bit lately about where I...
  3. Truth Or Dare While on Twitter last night, I posted a question, “What’s...
  4. Ketchup and Wine: Making the Time Spring has sprung, well sorta kinda. Nothing would be more...
  5. Giving Back: Selfish or Selfless This is a simple post. A post about giving back....
  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Social Privacy: Does It Exist? | Daniel Gordon -- Topsy.com

  • http://twitter.com/russkle Russell Stuever

    My main concern is with the persistence of social media. Once something is posted or tweeted, it lives somewhat perpetuity for someone to drag out years later. In most instance, the shear volume of information creates a cloud of noise that the average Joe isn't going to care to navigate. Yet, without a little elbow grease (or computer power) this information can be rapidly sorted into something that we might not want people to have access to.

    With that said, I agree that Social Privacy is an illusion. We can't control what others say and we reveal more about ourselves in casual conversations than what we think Facebook is revealing from our profiles.

  • http://twitter.com/russkle Russell Stuever

    After commenting, I stumbled across a quote that I thought might be relevant:

    “Security is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature, nor do the children of men as a whole experience it. Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. Life is either a daring adventure, or nothing.” – Helen Keller

  • http://twitter.com/emiluzelac SEO Agent

    Hey Dan,

    Can't agree more with your article, privacy is very important issue and once example.com changes something dramatically there's no turning back.

    If you remember while ago about what was going on with the famous artist Chris Brown? The guy had fantastic career, everything was going well for him, people loved him right? Well he made his choice and dramatically changed his career from being a good guy to Chris who?. Media “killed” him and probably his career as well.

    Same thing with Facebook, if they don't get their “act” straight asap, there will be hard to convince people to continue using their services. The fact is that Facebook helped millions of user connect, regardless if they're running personal or business account, however at the same time Facebook exists because of the users and nobody will change that.
    Thanks,
    Emil

  • http://dangordon.me/ Dan Gordon

    Thanks for the feedback! I absolutely agree that they do have an ethical responsibility to not share our data and information for the use of financial gain. I think it's something we won't be able to control, unfortunately. The only answer I could see to that is serving everything ourselves. I guess it's a price we have to pay to be where everyone's at. But, in the end it could change the landscape, who knows. I know one thing, if they succeed, i wholeheartedly believe that this will also change the way the advertising world works as well. Our human behavior patterns will be bought and sold by word of mouth data patterns and the results that can be predicted as a result of them, with influence and demand taken into consideration. When you think about it, pretty scary stuff. At least for now until we all get used to it :) Thanks Again! Appreciate you sharing your thoughts!

  • http://dangordon.me/ Dan Gordon

    Thanks, Russell. I agree completely. The data that is out there we share is not ours like was think it is. But, having said that… Has the ball been put in motion and moving to fast? Or will these startups like http://diaspora.com or even a service what makes it easy for us all to share like we do on Facebook and Twitter be invented. Port everything over and be done! :) wouldn't that be a dream come true :) THanks very much for your time and comments, look forward to connecting again soon.

  • prosperitygal

    I agree we have shifted into an arena of not having a traditional privacy. BIG difference is when the game is changed on you after you agreed to an original set of rules and understanding.

    Would be equivalent to getting married and agreeing we would stay monogamous then one of us cheats. How is facebook different from entering a relationship with me and then after being married for a while decide they want an swinging relationship NOT what we agreed. Why should I have to give in because they became greedy? Then to make matters worse tell me they can show all our private pictures to the world.

    Now for all you who like to argue, yes people CAN do that to their mates, question is DOES because they CAN make it RIGHT. And is it RIGHT they can tie you to a tree and strip you in public? That's where I find privacy argument not work for me.

    Ok, went on a slight rant there, this whole issue of privacy is making folks annoyed. One thing when I choose to share, quite another when you extort it from me.

  • Pingback: Social Piracy: The Recording Industry | Daniel Gordon

  • http://dangordon.me/ Dan Gordon

    Thanks for the interesting perspective. I agree wholeheartedly with your point. On their end it's not right. It's unethical and unfair. I guess it's going to have to take enough people making noise, which fortunately can be done right on their own site :) to make a difference with regards to the sharing of our data without our permission by them, the site itself. I just saw an article by Zuckerburg hit the Washing Post today. Did you read it, I would love your thoughts. It was really general, I wonder if it will be backed up by actions. I guess only time will tell. Here's a link http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/ar
    Thanks again, for taking the time to share your thoughts and comments. Greatly Appreciated! See you Online!